Cleared Traditional

DIGITAL ELECTRONIC EXERCISER/PULSE MTR. (K800072) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Physical Medicine device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K800072 · Sears, Roebuck & Co. · Physical Medicine device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jan 1980
Decision
14d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K800072 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the DIGITAL ELECTRONIC EXERCISER/PULSE MTR.. Classified as Exerciser, Measuring (product code ISD), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Sears, Roebuck & Co. (Mchenry, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on January 28, 1980 after a review of 14 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Physical Medicine FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 890.5360 - the FDA physical medicine device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Sears, Roebuck & Co. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K800072 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received January 14, 1980
Decision Date January 28, 1980
Days to Decision 14 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Physical Medicine (PM)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
101d faster than avg
Panel avg: 115d · This submission: 14d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code ISD Exerciser, Measuring
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 890.5360
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Physical Medicine devices follow this clearance model.