Cleared Traditional

K800646 - AMES TDA THEOPHYL-LINE TEST

K800646 is the FDA 510(k) clearance for AMES TDA THEOPHYL-LINE TEST by Miles Laboratories, Inc.. It is a Class 2 Toxicology device (product code KLS) cleared through the Traditional 510(k) pathway after a 17-day FDA review.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Apr 1980
Decision
17d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K800646 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the AMES TDA THEOPHYL-LINE TEST. Classified as Enzyme Immunoassay, Theophylline (product code KLS), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Miles Laboratories, Inc. (Walker, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on April 10, 1980 after a review of 17 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Toxicology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 862.3880 - the FDA toxicology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Miles Laboratories, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K800646 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received March 24, 1980
Decision Date April 10, 1980
Days to Decision 17 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Toxicology (TX)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Combination Product No
PCCP Authorized No
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
70d faster than avg
Panel avg: 87d · This submission: 17d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code KLS Enzyme Immunoassay, Theophylline
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 862.3880
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Toxicology devices follow this clearance model.