Cleared Traditional

K800999 - CAM-10 EXSUFFLATION BELT #11-001

K800999 is the FDA 510(k) clearance for CAM-10 EXSUFFLATION BELT #11-001 by Lifecare Services, Inc.. It is a Class 2 Anesthesiology device (product code CBK) cleared through the Traditional 510(k) pathway after a 33-day FDA review.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
May 1980
Decision
33d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K800999 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the CAM-10 EXSUFFLATION BELT #11-001. Classified as Ventilator, Continuous, Facility Use (product code CBK), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Lifecare Services, Inc. (Mchenry, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on May 28, 1980 after a review of 33 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Anesthesiology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 868.5895 - the FDA anesthesiology and respiratory device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Lifecare Services, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K800999 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received April 25, 1980
Decision Date May 28, 1980
Days to Decision 33 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Anesthesiology (AN)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
107d faster than avg
Panel avg: 140d · This submission: 33d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code CBK Ventilator, Continuous, Facility Use
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 868.5895
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Anesthesiology devices follow this clearance model.