Cleared Traditional

K803014 - SENSOMAT

K803014 is the FDA 510(k) clearance for SENSOMAT by Biochem International, Inc.. It is a Class 2 Anesthesiology device (product code CBZ) cleared through the Traditional 510(k) pathway after a 24-day FDA review.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Dec 1980
Decision
24d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K803014 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the SENSOMAT. Classified as Analyzer, Ion, Hydrogen-ion (ph), Blood-phase, Indwelling (product code CBZ), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Biochem International, Inc. (Mchenry, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on December 22, 1980 after a review of 24 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Anesthesiology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 868.1170 - the FDA anesthesiology and respiratory device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Biochem International, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K803014 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received November 28, 1980
Decision Date December 22, 1980
Days to Decision 24 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Anesthesiology (AN)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
116d faster than avg
Panel avg: 140d · This submission: 24d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code CBZ Analyzer, Ion, Hydrogen-ion (ph), Blood-phase, Indwelling
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 868.1170
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Anesthesiology devices follow this clearance model.