Cleared Traditional

K811159 - DYNASOUND 801

K811159 is the FDA 510(k) clearance for DYNASOUND 801 by Dynawave, Corp.. It is a Class 2 Physical Medicine device (product code IMI) cleared through the Traditional 510(k) pathway after a 29-day FDA review.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
May 1981
Decision
29d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K811159 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the DYNASOUND 801. Classified as Ultrasonic Diathermy For Use In Applying Therapeutic Deep Heat (product code IMI), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Dynawave, Corp. (Mchenry, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on May 27, 1981 after a review of 29 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Physical Medicine FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 890.5300 - the FDA physical medicine device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Dynawave, Corp. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K811159 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received April 28, 1981
Decision Date May 27, 1981
Days to Decision 29 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Physical Medicine (PM)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
86d faster than avg
Panel avg: 115d · This submission: 29d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code IMI Ultrasonic Diathermy For Use In Applying Therapeutic Deep Heat
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 890.5300
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Physical Medicine devices follow this clearance model.