Cleared Traditional

K811257 - CORNING 965 CARBON DIOXIDE ANALYZER (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Chemistry device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K811257 · Corning Medical & Scientific · Chemistry device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
May 1981
Decision
22d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K811257 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the CORNING 965 CARBON DIOXIDE ANALYZER. Classified as Coulometric Method, Carbon-dioxide (product code CHS), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Corning Medical & Scientific (Mchenry, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on May 27, 1981 after a review of 22 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Chemistry FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 862.1160 - the FDA in vitro diagnostics and chemistry framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Corning Medical & Scientific devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K811257 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received May 05, 1981
Decision Date May 27, 1981
Days to Decision 22 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Chemistry (CH)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
66d faster than avg
Panel avg: 88d · This submission: 22d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code CHS Coulometric Method, Carbon-dioxide
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 862.1160
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Chemistry devices follow this clearance model.