Cleared Traditional

K812487 - IMMUNOGL. FRCT. OF RABBIT ANTISER.-IGM (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Immunology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K812487 · Dako Corp. · Immunology device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Sep 1981
Decision
23d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K812487 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the IMMUNOGL. FRCT. OF RABBIT ANTISER.-IGM. Classified as Igm (mu Chain Specific), Antigen, Antiserum, Control (product code DAO), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Dako Corp. (Mchenry, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on September 23, 1981 after a review of 23 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Immunology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 866.5550 - the FDA immunology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Dako Corp. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K812487 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received August 31, 1981
Decision Date September 23, 1981
Days to Decision 23 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Immunology (IM)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
81d faster than avg
Panel avg: 104d · This submission: 23d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code DAO Igm (mu Chain Specific), Antigen, Antiserum, Control
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 866.5550
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Immunology devices follow this clearance model.