Cleared Traditional

K813172 - CONDOM-MULTIPAL STYLES

K813172 is the FDA 510(k) clearance for CONDOM-MULTIPAL STYLES by Circle Rubber Corp.. It is a Class 2 Obstetrics & Gynecology device (product code HIS) cleared through the Traditional 510(k) pathway after a 109-day FDA review.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Mar 1982
Decision
109d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K813172 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the CONDOM-MULTIPAL STYLES. Classified as Condom (product code HIS), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Circle Rubber Corp. (Mchenry, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on March 5, 1982 after a review of 109 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Obstetrics & Gynecology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 884.5300 - the FDA obstetrics and gynecology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Obstetrics & Gynecology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Circle Rubber Corp. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K813172 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received November 16, 1981
Decision Date March 05, 1982
Days to Decision 109 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Obstetrics & Gynecology (OB)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
51d faster than avg
Panel avg: 160d · This submission: 109d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code HIS Condom
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 884.5300
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Obstetrics & Gynecology devices follow this clearance model.