Cleared Traditional

K813451 - UVA FLUORESCENT TANNING LAMPS (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Radiology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K813451 · North American Philips Corp. · Radiology device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jan 1982
Decision
49d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K813451 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the UVA FLUORESCENT TANNING LAMPS. Classified as Lamp, Infrared, Non Heating (product code IOB), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by North American Philips Corp. (Mchenry, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on January 28, 1982 after a review of 49 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Radiology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 890.5500 - the FDA radiology and imaging software oversight framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all North American Philips Corp. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K813451 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received December 10, 1981
Decision Date January 28, 1982
Days to Decision 49 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Radiology (RA)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
58d faster than avg
Panel avg: 107d · This submission: 49d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code IOB Lamp, Infrared, Non Heating
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 890.5500
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Radiology devices follow this clearance model.