Cleared Traditional

K821299 - CER-MATE

K821299 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for CER-MATE, manufactured by J. Aderer, Inc.. The device is a Class 2 Dental device with product code EJS cleared through the Traditional 510(k) pathway after a 24-day FDA review.

K821299 · J. Aderer, Inc. · Dental device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
May 1982
Decision
24d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K821299 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the CER-MATE. Classified as Alloy, Other Noble Metal (product code EJS), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by J. Aderer, Inc. (Mchenry, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on May 28, 1982 after a review of 24 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Dental FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 872.3060 - the FDA dental device regulatory framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all J. Aderer, Inc. devices

FDA 510(k) Submission Details - K821299

510(k) Number K821299 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received May 04, 1982
Decision Date May 28, 1982
Days to Decision 24 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Dental (DE)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Combination Product No
PCCP Authorized No
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
103d faster than avg
Panel avg: 127d · This submission: 24d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

EJS Device Classification - Class 2, Special Controls

Product Code EJS Alloy, Other Noble Metal
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 872.3060
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Dental devices follow this clearance model.