Cleared Traditional

K823129 - ADVANCE EMIT-CAD N-ACETYLPROCAINAMIDE

K823129 is the FDA 510(k) clearance for ADVANCE EMIT-CAD N-ACETYLPROCAINAMIDE by Syva Co.. It is a Class 2 Chemistry device (product code LAN) cleared through the Traditional 510(k) pathway after a 35-day FDA review.

K823129 · Syva Co. · Chemistry device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Nov 1982
Decision
35d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K823129 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the ADVANCE EMIT-CAD N-ACETYLPROCAINAMIDE. Classified as Enzyme Immunoassay, N-acetylprocainamide (product code LAN), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Syva Co. (Mchenry, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on November 29, 1982 after a review of 35 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Chemistry FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 862.3320 - the FDA in vitro diagnostics and chemistry framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Syva Co. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K823129 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received October 25, 1982
Decision Date November 29, 1982
Days to Decision 35 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Chemistry (CH)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Combination Product No
PCCP Authorized No
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
53d faster than avg
Panel avg: 88d · This submission: 35d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code LAN Enzyme Immunoassay, N-acetylprocainamide
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 862.3320
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Chemistry devices follow this clearance model.