Cleared Traditional

K823387 - SOPHEIA GENTAMICIN EIA KIT

K823387 is the FDA 510(k) clearance for SOPHEIA GENTAMICIN EIA KIT by Diagnostic Products Corp.. It is a Class 2 Chemistry device (product code LCD) cleared through the Traditional 510(k) pathway after a 37-day FDA review.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Dec 1982
Decision
37d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K823387 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the SOPHEIA GENTAMICIN EIA KIT. Classified as Enzyme Immunoassay, Gentamicin (product code LCD), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Diagnostic Products Corp. (Mchenry, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on December 22, 1982 after a review of 37 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Chemistry FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 862.3450 - the FDA in vitro diagnostics and chemistry framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Diagnostic Products Corp. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K823387 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received November 15, 1982
Decision Date December 22, 1982
Days to Decision 37 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Chemistry (CH)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Combination Product No
PCCP Authorized No
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
51d faster than avg
Panel avg: 88d · This submission: 37d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code LCD Enzyme Immunoassay, Gentamicin
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 862.3450
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Chemistry devices follow this clearance model.