Cleared Traditional

K823487 - BARD URETERAL STENT

K823487 is the FDA 510(k) clearance for BARD URETERAL STENT by C.R. Bard, Inc.. It is a Class 2 Gastroenterology & Urology device (product code FAD) cleared through the Traditional 510(k) pathway after a 185-day FDA review.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
May 1983
Decision
185d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K823487 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the BARD URETERAL STENT. Classified as Stent, Ureteral (product code FAD), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by C.R. Bard, Inc. (Mchenry, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on May 27, 1983 after a review of 185 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Gastroenterology & Urology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 876.4620 - the FDA gastroenterology and urology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Gastroenterology & Urology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all C.R. Bard, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K823487 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received November 23, 1982
Decision Date May 27, 1983
Days to Decision 185 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Gastroenterology & Urology (GU)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Combination Product No
PCCP Authorized No
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
55d slower than avg
Panel avg: 130d · This submission: 185d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code FAD Stent, Ureteral
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 876.4620
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Gastroenterology & Urology devices follow this clearance model.