Cleared Traditional

CARIEL F12 (K823934) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Cardiovascular device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Dec 1983
Decision
352d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K823934 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the CARIEL F12. Classified as Vectorcardiograph (product code DYC), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Odam (France, FR). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on December 16, 1983 after a review of 352 days - an unusually long review period, suggesting complex equivalence evaluation.

This device falls under the Cardiovascular FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 870.2400 - the FDA cardiovascular device oversight framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Elevated predicate reliance profile. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Cardiovascular review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Odam devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K823934 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received December 29, 1982
Decision Date December 16, 1983
Days to Decision 352 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Cardiovascular (CV)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
227d slower than avg
Panel avg: 125d · This submission: 352d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code DYC Vectorcardiograph
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 870.2400
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Cardiovascular devices follow this clearance model.