Cleared Traditional

ABUSCREEN RADIOIMMUNOASSAY-BARBITURATE (K830479) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Toxicology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K830479 · Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc. · Toxicology device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Mar 1983
Decision
23d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K830479 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the ABUSCREEN RADIOIMMUNOASSAY-BARBITURATE. Classified as Radioimmunoassay, Barbiturate (product code DKN), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc. (Walker, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on March 10, 1983 after a review of 23 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Toxicology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 862.3150 - the FDA toxicology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K830479 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received February 15, 1983
Decision Date March 10, 1983
Days to Decision 23 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Toxicology (TX)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
64d faster than avg
Panel avg: 87d · This submission: 23d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code DKN Radioimmunoassay, Barbiturate
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 862.3150
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Toxicology devices follow this clearance model.