Cleared Traditional

K831458 - CARDIOPLEGIA RECIRCULATION SYS-BL 705/A (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Cardiovascular device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Oct 1983
Decision
167d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K831458 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the CARDIOPLEGIA RECIRCULATION SYS-BL 705/A. Classified as Pump, Blood, Cardiopulmonary Bypass, Roller Type (product code DWB), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Electromedics, Inc. (Walker, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on October 20, 1983 after a review of 167 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Cardiovascular FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 870.4370 - the FDA cardiovascular device oversight framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Cardiovascular review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Electromedics, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K831458 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received May 06, 1983
Decision Date October 20, 1983
Days to Decision 167 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Cardiovascular (CV)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
42d slower than avg
Panel avg: 125d · This submission: 167d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code DWB Pump, Blood, Cardiopulmonary Bypass, Roller Type
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 870.4370
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Cardiovascular devices follow this clearance model.