Cleared Traditional

VZV BIO-ENZABEAD SCREEN KIT (K833637) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Immunology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Feb 1984
Decision
116d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K833637 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the VZV BIO-ENZABEAD SCREEN KIT. Classified as Enzyme Linked Immunoabsorbent Assay, Varicella-zoster (product code LFY), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Bionetic Laboratory Products (Mchenry, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on February 10, 1984 after a review of 116 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Immunology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 866.3900 - the FDA immunology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Immunology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Bionetic Laboratory Products devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K833637 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received October 17, 1983
Decision Date February 10, 1984
Days to Decision 116 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Immunology (IM)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
12d slower than avg
Panel avg: 104d · This submission: 116d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code LFY Enzyme Linked Immunoabsorbent Assay, Varicella-zoster
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 866.3900
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Immunology devices follow this clearance model.