Cleared Traditional

K840908 - CHESTAC-25F SPIROMETER

K840908 is the FDA 510(k) clearance for CHESTAC-25F SPIROMETER by Medical Equipment Designs, Inc.. It is a Class 2 Anesthesiology device (product code BZG) cleared through the Traditional 510(k) pathway after a 75-day FDA review.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
May 1984
Decision
75d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K840908 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the CHESTAC-25F SPIROMETER. Classified as Spirometer, Diagnostic (product code BZG), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Medical Equipment Designs, Inc. (Mchenry, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on May 14, 1984 after a review of 75 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Anesthesiology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 868.1840 - the FDA anesthesiology and respiratory device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Medical Equipment Designs, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K840908 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received February 29, 1984
Decision Date May 14, 1984
Days to Decision 75 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Anesthesiology (AN)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
65d faster than avg
Panel avg: 140d · This submission: 75d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code BZG Spirometer, Diagnostic
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 868.1840
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Anesthesiology devices follow this clearance model.