Cleared Traditional

K841170 - SICKLE HB ASSAY

K841170 is the FDA 510(k) clearance for SICKLE HB ASSAY by Isolab, Inc.. It is a Class 2 Hematology device (product code GHM) cleared through the Traditional 510(k) pathway after a 16-day FDA review.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Apr 1984
Decision
16d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K841170 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the SICKLE HB ASSAY. Classified as Test, Sickle Cell (product code GHM), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Isolab, Inc. (Walker, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on April 4, 1984 after a review of 16 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Hematology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 864.7825 - the FDA hematology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Isolab, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K841170 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received March 19, 1984
Decision Date April 04, 1984
Days to Decision 16 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Hematology (HE)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Combination Product No
PCCP Authorized No
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
97d faster than avg
Panel avg: 113d · This submission: 16d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code GHM Test, Sickle Cell
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 864.7825
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Hematology devices follow this clearance model.