Cleared Traditional

RIANEN CYCLIC-AMP RADIOIMMUNOASSAY (K841478) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Chemistry device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K841478 · New England Nuclear · Chemistry device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jun 1984
Decision
66d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K841478 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the RIANEN CYCLIC-AMP RADIOIMMUNOASSAY. Classified as Radioimmunoassay, Cyclic Amp (product code CHO), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by New England Nuclear (Mchenry, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on June 14, 1984 after a review of 66 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Chemistry FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 862.1230 - the FDA in vitro diagnostics and chemistry framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all New England Nuclear devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K841478 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received April 09, 1984
Decision Date June 14, 1984
Days to Decision 66 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Chemistry (CH)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
22d faster than avg
Panel avg: 88d · This submission: 66d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code CHO Radioimmunoassay, Cyclic Amp
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 862.1230
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Chemistry devices follow this clearance model.