Cleared Traditional

ENZYMATIC ACETAMINOPHEN ASSAY (K841930) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Toxicology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K841930 · Diagnostic Chemicals, Ltd. (Usa) · Toxicology device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jun 1984
Decision
46d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K841930 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the ENZYMATIC ACETAMINOPHEN ASSAY. Classified as Anti-sm Antibody, Antigen And Control (product code LKP), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Diagnostic Chemicals, Ltd. (Usa) (Canada, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on June 25, 1984 after a review of 46 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Toxicology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 866.5100 - the FDA toxicology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Diagnostic Chemicals, Ltd. (Usa) devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K841930 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received May 10, 1984
Decision Date June 25, 1984
Days to Decision 46 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Toxicology (TX)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
41d faster than avg
Panel avg: 87d · This submission: 46d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code LKP Anti-sm Antibody, Antigen And Control
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 866.5100
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Toxicology devices follow this clearance model.