Cleared Traditional

FIAX TRANSFERRIN TEST KIT (K842071) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Immunology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K842071 · Intl. Diagnostic Technology · Immunology device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jul 1984
Decision
49d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K842071 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the FIAX TRANSFERRIN TEST KIT. Classified as Transferrin, Fitc, Antigen, Antiserum, Control (product code DDI), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Intl. Diagnostic Technology (Mchenry, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on July 11, 1984 after a review of 49 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Immunology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 866.5880 - the FDA immunology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Intl. Diagnostic Technology devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K842071 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received May 23, 1984
Decision Date July 11, 1984
Days to Decision 49 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Immunology (IM)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
55d faster than avg
Panel avg: 104d · This submission: 49d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code DDI Transferrin, Fitc, Antigen, Antiserum, Control
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 866.5880
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Immunology devices follow this clearance model.