Cleared Traditional

K842859 - MICROSCOPE MITTS SUPPORT TRAY COVER

K842859 is the FDA 510(k) clearance for MICROSCOPE MITTS SUPPORT TRAY COVER by Chiron Vision Corp.. It is a Class 2 Ophthalmic device (product code HJO) cleared through the Traditional 510(k) pathway after a 74-day FDA review.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Oct 1984
Decision
74d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K842859 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the MICROSCOPE MITTS SUPPORT TRAY COVER. Classified as Biomicroscope, Slit-lamp, Ac-powered (product code HJO), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Chiron Vision Corp. (Irvine, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on October 5, 1984 after a review of 74 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Ophthalmic FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 886.1850 - the FDA ophthalmic device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Chiron Vision Corp. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K842859 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received July 23, 1984
Decision Date October 05, 1984
Days to Decision 74 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Ophthalmic (OP)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Combination Product No
PCCP Authorized No
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
36d faster than avg
Panel avg: 110d · This submission: 74d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code HJO Biomicroscope, Slit-lamp, Ac-powered
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 886.1850
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Ophthalmic devices follow this clearance model.