Cleared Traditional

COMPUTER INTERFACE - BIOFEEDBACK (K850759) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Neurology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K850759 · M.O.E Electronics Research & Prod. · Neurology device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
May 1985
Decision
87d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K850759 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the COMPUTER INTERFACE - BIOFEEDBACK. Classified as Device, Biofeedback (product code HCC), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by M.O.E Electronics Research & Prod. (Santa Cruz, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on May 23, 1985 after a review of 87 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Neurology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 882.5050 - the FDA neurology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all M.O.E Electronics Research & Prod. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K850759 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received February 25, 1985
Decision Date May 23, 1985
Days to Decision 87 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Neurology (NE)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
61d faster than avg
Panel avg: 148d · This submission: 87d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code HCC Device, Biofeedback
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 882.5050
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Neurology devices follow this clearance model.