Cleared Traditional

K851480 - VYGON GUEDEL AIRWAY 511 VYGON BERMANN/OROPHAR AIRW (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Toxicology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K851480 · Vygon Corp. · Toxicology device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
May 1985
Decision
22d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K851480 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the VYGON GUEDEL AIRWAY 511 VYGON BERMANN/OROPHAR AIRW. Classified as High Pressure Liquid Chromatography, Codeine (product code LAE), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Vygon Corp. (East Rutherford, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on May 7, 1985 after a review of 22 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Toxicology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 862.3270 - the FDA toxicology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Vygon Corp. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K851480 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received April 15, 1985
Decision Date May 07, 1985
Days to Decision 22 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Toxicology (TX)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
65d faster than avg
Panel avg: 87d · This submission: 22d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code LAE High Pressure Liquid Chromatography, Codeine
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 862.3270
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Toxicology devices follow this clearance model.