Cleared Traditional

K852510 - COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY COUCH PAD FOR MIN ANALYSIS (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Radiology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K852510 · Image Analysis, Inc. · Radiology device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Oct 1985
Decision
128d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K852510 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY COUCH PAD FOR MIN ANALYSIS. Classified as Densitometer, Bone (product code KGI), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Image Analysis, Inc. (Irvine, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on October 18, 1985 after a review of 128 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Radiology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 892.1170 - the FDA radiology and imaging software oversight framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Radiology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Image Analysis, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K852510 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received June 12, 1985
Decision Date October 18, 1985
Days to Decision 128 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Radiology (RA)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
21d slower than avg
Panel avg: 107d · This submission: 128d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code KGI Densitometer, Bone
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 892.1170
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Radiology devices follow this clearance model.