Cleared Traditional

K853038 - DE12 RAPID TRACE AT-REST DIAGNOSTIC ECG ELECTRODES (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Cardiovascular device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jan 1986
Decision
172d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K853038 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the DE12 RAPID TRACE AT-REST DIAGNOSTIC ECG ELECTRODES. Classified as Electrode, Electrocardiograph (product code DRX), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Bio-Detek, Inc. (Mansfield, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on January 7, 1986 after a review of 172 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Cardiovascular FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 870.2360 - the FDA cardiovascular device oversight framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Cardiovascular review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Bio-Detek, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K853038 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received July 19, 1985
Decision Date January 07, 1986
Days to Decision 172 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Cardiovascular (CV)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
47d slower than avg
Panel avg: 125d · This submission: 172d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code DRX Electrode, Electrocardiograph
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 870.2360
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Cardiovascular devices follow this clearance model.