Cleared Traditional

CONNECTOR, BLOOD TUBING, INFUSION T. INTRAVENOUS I (K854562) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II General Hospital device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K854562 · Medelec Intl. Corp. · General Hospital
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jan 1986
Decision
56d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K854562 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the CONNECTOR, BLOOD TUBING, INFUSION T. INTRAVENOUS I. Classified as Set, Blood Transfusion (product code BRZ), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Medelec Intl. Corp. (Miami Beach, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on January 9, 1986 after a review of 56 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the General Hospital FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 880.5440 - the FDA general hospital device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Medelec Intl. Corp. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K854562 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received November 14, 1985
Decision Date January 09, 1986
Days to Decision 56 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel General Hospital (HO)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
73d faster than avg
Panel avg: 129d · This submission: 56d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code BRZ Set, Blood Transfusion
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 880.5440
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most General Hospital devices follow this clearance model.