Cleared Traditional

K860996 - SANASSAY IC TEST (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Immunology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Mar 1987
Decision
384d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K860996 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the SANASSAY IC TEST. Classified as Complement C1q, Antigen, Antiserum, Control (product code DAK), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Scientific Sales Intl., Inc. (Kalamazoo, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on March 30, 1987 after a review of 384 days - an unusually long review period, suggesting complex equivalence evaluation.

This device falls under the Immunology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 866.5240 - the FDA immunology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Elevated predicate reliance profile. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Immunology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Scientific Sales Intl., Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K860996 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received March 11, 1986
Decision Date March 30, 1987
Days to Decision 384 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Immunology (IM)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
280d slower than avg
Panel avg: 104d · This submission: 384d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code DAK Complement C1q, Antigen, Antiserum, Control
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 866.5240
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Immunology devices follow this clearance model.