Cleared Traditional

K870505 - OPTILASE YAG MODEL 1000 SURG LASER SYS/PULMON APPL (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Anesthesiology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Aug 1987
Decision
184d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K870505 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the OPTILASE YAG MODEL 1000 SURG LASER SYS/PULMON APPL. Classified as Laser, Neodymium:yag, Pulmonary Surgery (product code LLO), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Trimedyne, Inc. (Santa Ana, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on August 7, 1987 after a review of 184 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Anesthesiology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 874.4500 - the FDA anesthesiology and respiratory device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Anesthesiology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Trimedyne, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K870505 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received February 04, 1987
Decision Date August 07, 1987
Days to Decision 184 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Anesthesiology (AN)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
45d slower than avg
Panel avg: 139d · This submission: 184d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code LLO Laser, Neodymium:yag, Pulmonary Surgery
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 874.4500
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Anesthesiology devices follow this clearance model.