Cleared Traditional

DSL SOMATOMEDIN-C (DSL #5600) (K875229) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class I Chemistry device.

K875229 · Diagnostic Systems Laboratories, Inc. · Chemistry device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jul 1988
Decision
192d
Days
Class 1
Risk

K875229 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the DSL SOMATOMEDIN-C (DSL #5600). Classified as Radioimmunoassay, Human Growth Hormone (product code CFL), Class I - General Controls.

Submitted by Diagnostic Systems Laboratories, Inc. (Webster, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on July 1, 1988 after a review of 192 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Chemistry FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 862.1370 - the FDA in vitro diagnostics and chemistry framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Chemistry review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Diagnostic Systems Laboratories, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K875229 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received December 22, 1987
Decision Date July 01, 1988
Days to Decision 192 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Chemistry (CH)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
104d slower than avg
Panel avg: 88d · This submission: 192d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence.

Device Classification

Product Code CFL Radioimmunoassay, Human Growth Hormone
Device Class Class 1 - General Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 862.1370
What this classification means

Class I devices are subject to general controls only and most are exempt from 510(k) premarket notification. They represent the lowest regulatory burden in the FDA device framework.