Cleared Traditional

SLT CL60 CONTACT LASER SYSTEM, CUTTING & COAGULA. (K882908) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Ophthalmic device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K882908 · Surgical Laser Technologies, Inc. · Ophthalmic device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Sep 1988
Decision
80d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K882908 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the SLT CL60 CONTACT LASER SYSTEM, CUTTING & COAGULA.. Classified as Laser, Ophthalmic (product code HQF), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Surgical Laser Technologies, Inc. (Malvern, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on September 30, 1988 after a review of 80 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Ophthalmic FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 886.4390 - the FDA ophthalmic device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Surgical Laser Technologies, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K882908 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received July 12, 1988
Decision Date September 30, 1988
Days to Decision 80 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Ophthalmic (OP)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
30d faster than avg
Panel avg: 110d · This submission: 80d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code HQF Laser, Ophthalmic
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 886.4390
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Ophthalmic devices follow this clearance model.