Cleared Traditional

K883592 - IMPRA DUAL LUMEN SUBCLAVIAN - FEMORAL CATHETER (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Gastroenterology & Urology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K883592 · Impra, Inc. · Gastroenterology & Urology device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Dec 1988
Decision
107d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K883592 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the IMPRA DUAL LUMEN SUBCLAVIAN - FEMORAL CATHETER. Classified as Catheter, Subclavian (product code LFJ), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Impra, Inc. (Tempe, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on December 8, 1988 after a review of 107 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Gastroenterology & Urology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 876.5540 - the FDA gastroenterology and urology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Gastroenterology & Urology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Impra, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K883592 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Direct De Novo (SESD)
Date Received August 23, 1988
Decision Date December 08, 1988
Days to Decision 107 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Gastroenterology & Urology (GU)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
23d faster than avg
Panel avg: 130d · This submission: 107d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code LFJ Catheter, Subclavian
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 876.5540
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Gastroenterology & Urology devices follow this clearance model.