Cleared Traditional

K890499 - BIVONA VENTILATOR ISOLATOR SYSTEM (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class I Anesthesiology device.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jun 1989
Decision
134d
Days
Class 1
Risk

K890499 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the BIVONA VENTILATOR ISOLATOR SYSTEM. Classified as Circuit, Breathing (w Connector, Adaptor, Y Piece) (product code CAI), Class I - General Controls.

Submitted by Bivona Medical Technologies (Gary, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on June 15, 1989 after a review of 134 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Anesthesiology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 868.5240 - the FDA anesthesiology and respiratory device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Anesthesiology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Bivona Medical Technologies devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K890499 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received February 01, 1989
Decision Date June 15, 1989
Days to Decision 134 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Anesthesiology (AN)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
5d faster than avg
Panel avg: 139d · This submission: 134d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence.

Device Classification

Product Code CAI Circuit, Breathing (w Connector, Adaptor, Y Piece)
Device Class Class 1 - General Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 868.5240
What this classification means

Class I devices are subject to general controls only and most are exempt from 510(k) premarket notification. They represent the lowest regulatory burden in the FDA device framework.