Cleared Traditional

ISL QC 2000 (K892058) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Ophthalmic device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K892058 · Intelligent Surgical Lasers, Inc. · Ophthalmic device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jun 1989
Decision
78d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K892058 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the ISL QC 2000. Classified as Laser, Neodymium:yag, Ophthalmic For Posterior Capsulotomy And Cutting Pupilla (product code LXS), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Intelligent Surgical Lasers, Inc. (San Diego, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on June 15, 1989 after a review of 78 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Ophthalmic FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 886.4392 - the FDA ophthalmic device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Intelligent Surgical Lasers, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K892058 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received March 29, 1989
Decision Date June 15, 1989
Days to Decision 78 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Ophthalmic (OP)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
32d faster than avg
Panel avg: 110d · This submission: 78d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code LXS Laser, Neodymium:yag, Ophthalmic For Posterior Capsulotomy And Cutting Pupilla
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 886.4392
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Ophthalmic devices follow this clearance model.