Cleared Traditional

K893766 - LIFECARE CONT. EPIDURAL CATH. FOR MORPHINE SULFATE (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II General Hospital device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Nov 1989
Decision
166d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K893766 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the LIFECARE CONT. EPIDURAL CATH. FOR MORPHINE SULFATE. Classified as Catheter, Percutaneous, Intraspinal, Short Term (product code MAJ), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Abbott Laboratories (Abbott Park, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on November 1, 1989 after a review of 166 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the General Hospital FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 868.5120 - the FDA general hospital device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the General Hospital review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Abbott Laboratories devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K893766 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received May 19, 1989
Decision Date November 01, 1989
Days to Decision 166 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel General Hospital (HO)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
38d slower than avg
Panel avg: 128d · This submission: 166d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code MAJ Catheter, Percutaneous, Intraspinal, Short Term
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 868.5120
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most General Hospital devices follow this clearance model.