Cleared Traditional

K894943 - CLINIGEN ERYTHROPOIETIN HUMAN SERUM CON...

K894943 is the FDA 510(k) clearance for CLINIGEN ERYTHROPOIETIN HUMAN SERUM CON... by Amgen, Inc.. It is a Class 2 Hematology device (product code GGT) cleared through the Traditional 510(k) pathway after a 68-day FDA review.

K894943 · Amgen, Inc. · Hematology device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Oct 1989
Decision
68d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K894943 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the CLINIGEN ERYTHROPOIETIN HUMAN SERUM CONTROLS 1,2,3. Classified as Assay, Erythropoietin (product code GGT), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Amgen, Inc. (Thousand Oaks, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on October 10, 1989 after a review of 68 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Hematology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 864.7250 - the FDA hematology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Amgen, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K894943 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received August 03, 1989
Decision Date October 10, 1989
Days to Decision 68 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Hematology (HE)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
45d faster than avg
Panel avg: 113d · This submission: 68d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code GGT Assay, Erythropoietin
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 864.7250
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Hematology devices follow this clearance model.