Cleared Traditional

MODIFIED HEMOGLOBIN REAGENT SET (K894951) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Hematology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Oct 1989
Decision
96d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K894951 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the MODIFIED HEMOGLOBIN REAGENT SET. Classified as Cyanomethemoglobin (product code GKK), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Macomb Biotechnology, Inc. (Romeo, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on October 24, 1989 after a review of 96 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Hematology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 864.7500 - the FDA hematology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Hematology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Macomb Biotechnology, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K894951 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received July 20, 1989
Decision Date October 24, 1989
Days to Decision 96 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Hematology (HE)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
17d faster than avg
Panel avg: 113d · This submission: 96d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code GKK Cyanomethemoglobin
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 864.7500
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Hematology devices follow this clearance model.