Cleared Traditional

BUZZY BEAR ENURESIS ALARM (K895852) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Gastroenterology & Urology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K895852 · Med-Design, Inc. · Gastroenterology & Urology device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Feb 1990
Decision
132d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K895852 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the BUZZY BEAR ENURESIS ALARM. Classified as Alarm, Conditioned Response Enuresis (product code KPN), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Med-Design, Inc. (Jamestown, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on February 12, 1990 after a review of 132 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Gastroenterology & Urology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 876.2040 - the FDA gastroenterology and urology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Gastroenterology & Urology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Med-Design, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K895852 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received October 03, 1989
Decision Date February 12, 1990
Days to Decision 132 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Gastroenterology & Urology (GU)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
2d slower than avg
Panel avg: 130d · This submission: 132d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code KPN Alarm, Conditioned Response Enuresis
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 876.2040
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Gastroenterology & Urology devices follow this clearance model.