Cleared Traditional

K900321 - DYNATRON 330 BODY COMPOSITION ANALYZER

K900321 is the FDA 510(k) clearance for DYNATRON 330 BODY COMPOSITION ANALYZER by Dynatronics Laser Corp.. It is a Class 2 Cardiovascular device (product code DSB) cleared through the Traditional 510(k) pathway after a 139-day FDA review.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jun 1990
Decision
139d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K900321 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the DYNATRON 330 BODY COMPOSITION ANALYZER. Classified as Plethysmograph, Impedance (product code DSB), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Dynatronics Laser Corp. (Salt Lake City, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on June 11, 1990 after a review of 139 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Cardiovascular FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 870.2770 - the FDA cardiovascular device oversight framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Cardiovascular review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Dynatronics Laser Corp. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K900321 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received January 23, 1990
Decision Date June 11, 1990
Days to Decision 139 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Cardiovascular (CV)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
14d slower than avg
Panel avg: 125d · This submission: 139d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code DSB Plethysmograph, Impedance
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 870.2770
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Cardiovascular devices follow this clearance model.