Cleared Traditional

K901954 - AMEDA/EGNELL DOLPHIN UMBILICAL CORD SEVERING DEVIC (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Obstetrics & Gynecology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K901954 · Hollister, Inc. · Obstetrics & Gynecology device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jul 1990
Decision
86d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K901954 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the AMEDA/EGNELL DOLPHIN UMBILICAL CORD SEVERING DEVIC. Classified as Clamp, Umbilical (product code HFW), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Hollister, Inc. (Chicago, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on July 26, 1990 after a review of 86 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Obstetrics & Gynecology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 884.4530 - the FDA obstetrics and gynecology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Hollister, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K901954 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received May 01, 1990
Decision Date July 26, 1990
Days to Decision 86 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Obstetrics & Gynecology (OB)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
74d faster than avg
Panel avg: 160d · This submission: 86d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code HFW Clamp, Umbilical
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 884.4530
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Obstetrics & Gynecology devices follow this clearance model.