Cleared Traditional

K902437 - COBE CARDIOTOMY RESERVOIR WITH OR WITHOUT FILTER (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Cardiovascular device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Dec 1990
Decision
196d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K902437 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the COBE CARDIOTOMY RESERVOIR WITH OR WITHOUT FILTER. Classified as Defoamer, Cardiopulmonary Bypass (product code DTP), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Cobe Laboratories, Inc. (Arvada, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on December 17, 1990 after a review of 196 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Cardiovascular FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 870.4230 - the FDA cardiovascular device oversight framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Cardiovascular review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Cobe Laboratories, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K902437 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received June 04, 1990
Decision Date December 17, 1990
Days to Decision 196 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Cardiovascular (CV)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
71d slower than avg
Panel avg: 125d · This submission: 196d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code DTP Defoamer, Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 870.4230
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Cardiovascular devices follow this clearance model.