Cleared Traditional

OBER2 MONITOR, EYE MOVEMENT (OPHTHALMIC) (K902954) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Obstetrics & Gynecology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K902954 · Permobil AB · Obstetrics & Gynecology device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Aug 1990
Decision
49d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K902954 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the OBER2 MONITOR, EYE MOVEMENT (OPHTHALMIC). Classified as Aspirator, Endocervical (product code HFC), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Permobil AB (Burlington, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on August 23, 1990 after a review of 49 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Obstetrics & Gynecology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 884.1050 - the FDA obstetrics and gynecology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Permobil AB devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K902954 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received July 05, 1990
Decision Date August 23, 1990
Days to Decision 49 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Obstetrics & Gynecology (OB)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
111d faster than avg
Panel avg: 160d · This submission: 49d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code HFC Aspirator, Endocervical
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 884.1050
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Obstetrics & Gynecology devices follow this clearance model.