Cleared Traditional

SCREW-VENT ENDOSSEOUS HA COATED DENTAL IMPLANTS (K902969) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Dental device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K902969 · Core-Vent Corp. · Dental device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Dec 1990
Decision
164d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K902969 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the SCREW-VENT ENDOSSEOUS HA COATED DENTAL IMPLANTS. Classified as Implant, Endosseous, Root-form (product code DZE), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Core-Vent Corp. (Encino, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on December 17, 1990 after a review of 164 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Dental FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 872.3640 - the FDA dental device regulatory framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Dental review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Core-Vent Corp. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K902969 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received July 06, 1990
Decision Date December 17, 1990
Days to Decision 164 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Dental (DE)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
37d slower than avg
Panel avg: 127d · This submission: 164d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code DZE Implant, Endosseous, Root-form
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 872.3640
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Dental devices follow this clearance model.