Cleared Traditional

PART NUMBER: TA-1118 TAP (K903112) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Dental device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K903112 · Minimatic Implant Technology · Dental device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Nov 1990
Decision
123d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K903112 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the PART NUMBER: TA-1118 TAP. Classified as Implant, Endosseous, Root-form (product code DZE), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Minimatic Implant Technology (Deerfield Beach, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on November 13, 1990 after a review of 123 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Dental FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 872.3640 - the FDA dental device regulatory framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Dental review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Minimatic Implant Technology devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K903112 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received July 13, 1990
Decision Date November 13, 1990
Days to Decision 123 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Dental (DE)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
4d faster than avg
Panel avg: 127d · This submission: 123d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code DZE Implant, Endosseous, Root-form
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 872.3640
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Dental devices follow this clearance model.