Cleared Traditional

PAROJECT ANESTHETIC SYRINGE (K904279) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Dental device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Dec 1990
Decision
81d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K904279 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the PAROJECT ANESTHETIC SYRINGE. Classified as Injector, Jet, Mechanical-powered (product code EGM), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Ronvig Instruments, Ltd. (Milford, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on December 7, 1990 after a review of 81 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Dental FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 872.4475 - the FDA dental device regulatory framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Ronvig Instruments, Ltd. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K904279 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received September 17, 1990
Decision Date December 07, 1990
Days to Decision 81 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Dental (DE)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
46d faster than avg
Panel avg: 127d · This submission: 81d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code EGM Injector, Jet, Mechanical-powered
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 872.4475
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Dental devices follow this clearance model.