Cleared Traditional

MILENIA COCAINE METABOLITE (K910044) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Toxicology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K910044 · Diagnostic Products Corp. · Toxicology device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Feb 1991
Decision
40d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K910044 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the MILENIA COCAINE METABOLITE. Classified as Radioimmunoassay, Cocaine Metabolite (product code KLN), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Diagnostic Products Corp. (Los Angeles, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on February 13, 1991 after a review of 40 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Toxicology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 862.3250 - the FDA toxicology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Diagnostic Products Corp. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K910044 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received January 04, 1991
Decision Date February 13, 1991
Days to Decision 40 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Toxicology (TX)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Combination Product No
PCCP Authorized No
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
47d faster than avg
Panel avg: 87d · This submission: 40d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code KLN Radioimmunoassay, Cocaine Metabolite
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 862.3250
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Toxicology devices follow this clearance model.