Cleared Traditional

K910262 - KELLER VITAL SIGNS MONITOR - KMS-890 (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Cardiovascular device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K910262 · Keller Medical Specialties Products, Inc. · Cardiovascular device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Apr 1991
Decision
69d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K910262 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the KELLER VITAL SIGNS MONITOR - KMS-890. Classified as Alarm, Blood-pressure (product code DSJ), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Keller Medical Specialties Products, Inc. (Antioch, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on April 1, 1991 after a review of 69 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Cardiovascular FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 870.1100 - the FDA cardiovascular device oversight framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Keller Medical Specialties Products, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K910262 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received January 22, 1991
Decision Date April 01, 1991
Days to Decision 69 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Cardiovascular (CV)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
56d faster than avg
Panel avg: 125d · This submission: 69d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code DSJ Alarm, Blood-pressure
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 870.1100
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Cardiovascular devices follow this clearance model.