Cleared Traditional

K910286 - PLATELET AGGREGATION REAGENTS (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Hematology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K910286 · Medical Diagnostic Technologies, Inc. · Hematology device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Mar 1991
Decision
56d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K910286 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the PLATELET AGGREGATION REAGENTS. Classified as Reagent, Platelet Aggregation (product code GHR), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Medical Diagnostic Technologies, Inc. (Ventura, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on March 19, 1991 after a review of 56 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Hematology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 864.5700 - the FDA hematology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Medical Diagnostic Technologies, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K910286 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received January 22, 1991
Decision Date March 19, 1991
Days to Decision 56 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Hematology (HE)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
57d faster than avg
Panel avg: 113d · This submission: 56d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code GHR Reagent, Platelet Aggregation
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 864.5700
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Hematology devices follow this clearance model.