Cleared Traditional

K911056 - DU PONT DIMENSION(R) PHENYTOIN (PTN) METHOD (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Toxicology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K911056 · E.I. Dupont DE Nemours & Co., Inc. · Toxicology device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Apr 1991
Decision
26d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K911056 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the DU PONT DIMENSION(R) PHENYTOIN (PTN) METHOD. Classified as Enzyme Immunoassay, Diphenylhydantoin (product code DIP), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by E.I. Dupont DE Nemours & Co., Inc. (Wilmington, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on April 3, 1991 after a review of 26 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Toxicology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 862.3350 - the FDA toxicology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all E.I. Dupont DE Nemours & Co., Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K911056 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received March 08, 1991
Decision Date April 03, 1991
Days to Decision 26 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Toxicology (TX)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
61d faster than avg
Panel avg: 87d · This submission: 26d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code DIP Enzyme Immunoassay, Diphenylhydantoin
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 862.3350
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Toxicology devices follow this clearance model.